AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 65% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 876 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 300 Watt
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 17 November 2014
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

55.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
7x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
12x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 10229
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 30.848
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 438.581
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 2.268
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 46.988
Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 139.235

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090 vs 10229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.435 vs 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444 vs 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289 vs 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764 vs 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978 vs 139.235

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10229

17090

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.848

64.435

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

438.581

1476.444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.268

6.289

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.988

75.764

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.235

198.978

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832
PassMark - G2D Mark	402
Geekbench - OpenCL	10229	17090
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848	64.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581	1476.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268	6.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988	75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235	198.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Lexa	GK210
Launch date	12 June 2017	17 November 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	804	805
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	562 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	2x 4,373 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	2x 2496
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2x 12 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s	2x 240.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5