NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
48.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
7.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 640
6.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 12020
Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 40.695
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 588.094
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 30.455
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 165.39
Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 3.205

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2014 vs 22 July 2014
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090 vs 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.435 vs 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444 vs 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764 vs 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978 vs 165.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289 vs 3.205

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 876 MHz
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 300 Watt

Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17090

12020

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

64.435

40.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1476.444

588.094

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

75.764

30.455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

198.978

165.39

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.289

3.205

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Geekbench - OpenCL	17090	12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.435	40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1476.444	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978	165.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.289	3.205
PassMark - G3D Mark		3552
PassMark - G2D Mark		545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GK210	GM107
Launch date	17 November 2014	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	804	805
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$395.75
Price now		$343.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1046 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops	1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2x 2496	640
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	68 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 12 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 240.6 GB / s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5