NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 62.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 24x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 1 GB
- 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18310 vs 9266
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 34.239
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 639.427
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 32
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 69.814
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 2.341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 18 February 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18310 vs 9266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 vs 69.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 vs 2.341 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18310 | 9266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | 69.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | 2.341 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GK210 | GM107 |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 754 | 755 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |