NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • 62.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
  • 9.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 512
  • 7.9x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
  • 24x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 1 GB
  • 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
  • Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18310 vs 9266
  • Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 34.239
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 639.427
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 32
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 69.814
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 2.341
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2496 vs 512
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 12 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18310 vs 9266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.651 vs 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1653.567 vs 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.984 vs 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 258.278 vs 69.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.882 vs 2.341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

  • Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 562 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed 1020 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed 1085 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18310
9266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
62.651
34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1653.567
639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
86.984
32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
258.278
69.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.882
2.341
Name NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Geekbench - OpenCL 18310 9266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.651 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1653.567 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.984 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 258.278 69.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.882 2.341
PassMark - G3D Mark 3344
PassMark - G2D Mark 508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1049

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Maxwell
Code name GK210 GM107
Launch date 17 November 2014 18 February 2014
Place in performance rating 754 755
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $119
Price now $150.99
Value for money (0-100) 27.54

Technical info

Boost clock speed 876 MHz 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 562 MHz 1020 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops 1,111 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2x 2496 512
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec 34.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 512
Maximum GPU temperature 95 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 12 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 2x 240.6 GB / s 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 384 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA