NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 18.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 2048
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 3,789 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 3 GB
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 8 January 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 3,789 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 3 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18310 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 754 | 756 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 274 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 264.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |