NVIDIA Tesla K80m versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 108.3 GTexel / s
- 3.7x plus de pipelines: 2x 2496 versus 1344
- 3.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,373 gflops versus 2,599 gflops
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 12 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18529 versus 12758
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 versus 34.836
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 versus 960.114
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 versus 59.57
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 versus 81.753
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 versus 3.038
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 November 2014 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 108.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2496 versus 1344 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,373 gflops versus 2,599 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 12 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18529 versus 12758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 versus 34.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 versus 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 versus 59.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 versus 81.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 versus 3.038 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Environ 67% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 562 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 876 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 562 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18529 | 12758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | 34.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | 59.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | 81.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | 3.038 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK210 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 17 November 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 690 | 691 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 876 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 562 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,373 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 108.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2x 12 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||

