NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2050 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 9.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 3799
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 9.69
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 615.217
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 1.004
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 26.748
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 3799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 vs 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 vs 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 vs 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 26.748 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 79% higher pipelines: 800 vs 448
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 95.318
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 vs 95.318 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 | 3799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 | 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 | 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 | 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 | 115.157 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1251 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF100 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 1128 | 1130 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Price now | $76.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 148.4 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M2050 with others
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIATesla M2050 vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
