NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 14% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 575 MHz
Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt

Launch date	30 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	657 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz
6.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 5585
Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 15.673
Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 509.958
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 1.512
Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 30.422
Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 53.992

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36584 vs 5585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.848 vs 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	966.795 vs 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.15 vs 1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	95.318 vs 53.992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5585

36584

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.673

23.848

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

509.958

966.795

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.512

3.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.422

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.992

95.318

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA Tesla M2050
PassMark - G3D Mark	1720
PassMark - G2D Mark	232
Geekbench - OpenCL	5585	36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673	23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958	966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512	3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992	95.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK106	GF100
Launch date	30 May 2013	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	1126	1128
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	657 MHz
Core clock speed	657 MHz	575 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	448
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s	32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	1
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB / s	148.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	3092 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA