NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 5599
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 15.673
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 509.958
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 1.512
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 30.422
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 53.992
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 5599 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 vs 15.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 vs 509.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 vs 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 30.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 vs 53.992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5599 | 36584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 23.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 966.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 3.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 95.318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | GF100 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1126 | 1128 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 148.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3092 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |