NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date 30 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 657 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050

  • Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 5599
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 15.673
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 509.958
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 1.512
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 30.422
  • Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 53.992
Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 3092 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36584 vs 5599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.848 vs 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 966.795 vs 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.15 vs 1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227 vs 30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.318 vs 53.992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5599
36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.673
23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
509.958
966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.512
3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.422
44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.992
95.318
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M NVIDIA Tesla M2050
PassMark - G3D Mark 1720
PassMark - G2D Mark 232
Geekbench - OpenCL 5599 36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.673 23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 509.958 966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.512 3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.422 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.992 95.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK106 GF100
Launch date 30 May 2013 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 1126 1128
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 657 MHz
Core clock speed 657 MHz 575 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 448
Texture fill rate 42.05 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s 148.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 3092 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA