NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date 5 October 2011 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 62 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050

  • Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 192
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 2600 MHz
  • 9.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 3925
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 11.122
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 320.57
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 12.67
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 31.168
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines 448 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 3092 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36584 vs 3925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.848 vs 11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 966.795 vs 320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227 vs 12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.318 vs 31.168

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3925
36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.122
23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
320.57
966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.67
44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.168
95.318
Name NVIDIA Quadro 2000D NVIDIA Tesla M2050
PassMark - G3D Mark 976
PassMark - G2D Mark 328
Geekbench - OpenCL 3925 36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 11.122 23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 320.57 966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0 3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.67 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.168 95.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Fermi
Code name GF106 GF100
Launch date 5 October 2011 25 July 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $599 $2,699
Place in performance rating 1130 1131
Price now $209
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 7.27

Technical info

Core clock speed 625 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 448
Texture fill rate 20 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 62 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 1,170 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 178 mm 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB / s 148.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz 3092 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5