NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 5 October 2011 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 192
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- 9.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 3925
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 vs 11.122
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 320.57
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 12.67
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 31.168
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3092 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 vs 3925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 vs 11.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 vs 320.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 12.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 vs 31.168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3925 | 36584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | 23.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | 966.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 3.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | 95.318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF106 | GF100 |
Launch date | 5 October 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $2,699 |
Place in performance rating | 1130 | 1131 |
Price now | $209 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 178 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 148.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 3092 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |