NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M40 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla M40

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
12x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 500 MHz
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10220 vs 9555
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 141.671
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 133.144

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 November 2015 vs 10 July 2015
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10220 vs 9555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	183.81 vs 141.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	160.359 vs 133.144

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
Around 5% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53054 vs 39179
Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 437
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3600.035 vs 2637.997
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.2 vs 13.059
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 791.572 vs 688.388

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	224.0 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3584 vs 3072
Floating-point performance	7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	53054 vs 39179
PassMark - G2D Mark	789 vs 437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3600.035 vs 2637.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.2 vs 13.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	791.572 vs 688.388

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39179

53054

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

437

789

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10220

9555

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

183.81

141.671

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2637.997

3600.035

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.059

13.2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

160.359

133.144

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

688.388

791.572

Name	NVIDIA Tesla M40	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL	39179	53054
PassMark - G2D Mark	437	789
PassMark - G3D Mark	10220	9555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	183.81	141.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2637.997	3600.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.059	13.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	160.359	133.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	688.388	791.572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4739

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla M40	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	GM200	Fiji
Launch date	10 November 2015	10 July 2015
Place in performance rating	260	263
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$549
Price now		$399.99
Value for money (0-100)		35.98
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	948 MHz
Floating-point performance	6,844 gflops	7,168 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	3072	3584
Texture fill rate	213.9 GTexel / s	224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	8,000 million	8,900 million
Compute units		56
Stream Processors		3584
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB / s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	4096 bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)