NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 6300
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 6300
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 5 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 6300 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 371
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8293 vs 6284
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 947 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 371 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8293 vs 6284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 775 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 | 8293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 5 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 359 | 360 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 4,849 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M6 with others
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
IntelArc A370M
