NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 6300
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 6300
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 5 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 6300 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 371
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8293 vs 6284
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 947 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 371 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8293 vs 6284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 774 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 | 8293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 5 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 359 | 360 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 4,849 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M6 with others
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
IntelArc A370M
NVIDIATesla M6 vs
IntelArc A570M
