NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 4,981 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 165 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 110.006
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1348.307
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 9.194
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 37.443
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 477.015
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 9566
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 9566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 4,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 165 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 vs 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 vs 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11127 vs 8768
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 vs 389
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33393 vs 31511
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11127 vs 8768 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 vs 389 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33393 vs 31511 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | 11127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 798 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31511 | 33393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 110.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1348.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 9.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 37.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 477.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 9566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4330 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 355 | 358 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Price now | $605.06 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1216 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla P4 with others
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
