NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 4,981 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 165 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37841 vs 34824
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 110.006
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1348.307
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 9.194
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 37.443
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 477.015
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 9566
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 9566
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 19 September 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 144 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 4,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37841 vs 34824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 vs 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 vs 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 vs 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11100 vs 8922
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 395
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11100 vs 8922 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 vs 395 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8922 | 11100 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 792 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37841 | 34824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 364 | 366 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 4,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |