NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 4,849 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8926 vs 8293
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 89.325
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1366.314
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 98.765
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 6300
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 6300

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 947 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 395
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 37758
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 vs 9.457
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 540.645 vs 523.29

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 8293
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	395 775
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	37758 102277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.62 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791.761 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.457 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.574 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	523.29 540.645
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11409 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 3354

Compare specifications (specs)