NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 54% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1664
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 3,920 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37758 vs 28476
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 105.107
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1225.96
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 8.76
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 35.714
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 489.884
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1664 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 3,920 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 vs 28476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 8.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 vs 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 489.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9638 vs 8926
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 395
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 11409
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 11409
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9638 vs 8926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 11409 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8926 | 9638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 769 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37758 | 28476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 489.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3626 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 362 | 363 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1664 |
| Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla P4 with others
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
IntelArc A370M
