Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A370M

NVIDIA Tesla P4

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 810 MHz
Around 93% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1063 MHz
771.3x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 147.62
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 9.457
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 395

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 Mar 2022 vs 13 September 2016
Core clock speed	1550 MHz vs 810 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171 vs 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937 vs 9.457
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 395

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1470.844
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 71.258
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 482.549
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8926 vs 5115
Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37758 vs 29668

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1791.761 vs 1470.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	99.574 vs 71.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	523.29 vs 482.549
PassMark - G3D Mark	8926 vs 5115
Geekbench - OpenCL	37758 vs 29668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

167.171

147.62

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1470.844

1791.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.937

9.457

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.258

99.574

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

482.549

523.29

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

395

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5115

8926

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29668

37758

Name	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Tesla P4
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171	147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844	1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937	9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258	99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549	523.29
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	395
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115	8926
Geekbench - OpenCL	29668	37758
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3341

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A370M	NVIDIA Tesla P4
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Code name	DG2-128	GP104
Launch date	30 Mar 2022	13 September 2016
Place in performance rating	361	362
Type		Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1063 MHz
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	810 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,050 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.198 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2560
Pixel fill rate	65.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s	170.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	7200 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		5,443 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5