NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 557 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 7927
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31552 vs 26889
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 114.389
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1451.124
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 8.266
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 70.038
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 314.404
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1791
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 8663
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1791
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 vs 7927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31552 vs 26889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 vs 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 vs 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 vs 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 1791 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- 12.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 170.1 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2560
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 5,443 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 389
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 170.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2560 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 5,443 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 389 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8768 | 7927 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31552 | 26889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 1791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 355 | 466 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 557 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |