NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs AMD FirePro S7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD FirePro S7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 950 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 4524
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 vs 52.282
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1275.287
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 5.886
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 66.159
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 271.967
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 27 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 vs 4524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 vs 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1275.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 66.159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 271.967 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7000
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 596
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD FirePro S7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 4524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1275.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 66.159 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 271.967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD FirePro S7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 27 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 263 | 399 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 76 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 292 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |