NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 947 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
• Around 82% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2816
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 5,632 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 8644
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180318 vs 42508
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 114.883
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 2460.464
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 11.12
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 628.757
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 vs 8729
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 vs 8729

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 770 vs 406
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 73.167
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3719
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3719

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16235 8644
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	406 770
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	180318 42508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	500.053 114.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7209.392 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.826 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.167 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1253.829 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16337 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16337 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3353

Compare specifications (specs)