NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1792
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 68.324
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1463.376
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 6.491
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 344.551
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 7062
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.133 vs 21.354
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3696
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3333
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3696
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.792 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2368.267 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.829 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.354 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	992.132 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 13032

Compare specifications (specs)