NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD Radeon E8870

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

AMD Radeon E8870

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
7.1x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
7.1x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 36.948
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 874.689
16.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 1.11
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 4620
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 4620

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 August 2016 vs 29 September 2015
Core clock speed	1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	342.9 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3584 vs 768
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	165.792 vs 36.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2368.267 vs 874.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.829 vs 1.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10841 vs 4620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10841 vs 4620

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3696
5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3333
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3696
5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3333

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5030 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	18191 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5030 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	18191 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.792

36.948

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2368.267

874.689

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.829

1.11

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10841

4620

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3696

5030

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

18191

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10841

4620

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3696

5030

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

18191

Name	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	AMD Radeon E8870
Geekbench - OpenCL	68299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	165.792	36.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2368.267	874.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.829	1.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	992.132
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10841	4620
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3696	5030
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333	18191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10841	4620
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3696	5030
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333	18191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9646
PassMark - G3D Mark		3368
PassMark - G2D Mark		708

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	AMD Radeon E8870
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP102	Saturn
Launch date	2 August 2016	29 September 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199
Place in performance rating	345	347
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz
Core clock speed	1417 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops	1,536 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	3584	768
Texture fill rate	342.9 GTexel / s	48 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	11,800 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB / s	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Shared memory	0