NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 975 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 3,994 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68312 vs 31775
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 84.462
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1734.394
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 8.988
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 460.234

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 21.354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	68312 31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.792 84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2368.267 1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.829 8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.354 86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	992.132 460.234

Compare specifications (specs)