NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 3,994 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68138 vs 31775
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 84.462
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1734.394
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 8.988
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 460.234
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 vs 14 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s vs 124.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops vs 3,994 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68138 vs 31775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 vs 84.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 vs 1734.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 vs 8.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 vs 460.234 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 21.354
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 vs 21.354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | AMD FirePro W9000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68138 | 31775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | 84.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | 1734.394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | 8.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | 86.984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | 460.234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9646 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | AMD FirePro W9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 14 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $3,999 |
Place in performance rating | 350 | 347 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | 975 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | 3,994 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | 124.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |