AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 1085 MHz
1880.2x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 11526
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 42.463
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 vs 642.715
Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 2.933
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 26.532
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 133.458
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329
15.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1090-1175 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200-1275 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	57671 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	56.81 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	775.281 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.602 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.428 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	257.062 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6571 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3688 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6571 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3688 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1774 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

534.2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3657
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 486

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 3657
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 486

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3657

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

486

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

57671

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

56.81

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

775.281

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.602

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

64.428

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

257.062

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6571

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6571

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1774

117

Name	AMD Radeon RX 560	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3657	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	486	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	57671	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	56.81	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	775.281	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.602	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.428	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	257.062	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6571	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3688	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6571	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3688	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1774	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 560	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 21	GM107
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation	4th Gen
Launch date	18 April 2017	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	$149
Place in performance rating	513	707
Price now	$104.99	$299.01
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	54.35	15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200-1275 MHz	1085 MHz
Compute units	14/16
Core clock speed	1090-1175 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	2.6 TFLOPs	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	20.40 GP/s
Render output units	16
Stream Processors	896/1024
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s	43.4 GTexel / s
Texture Units	64
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60-80 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	170 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA