AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1127 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 2680x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 6111
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 673
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 18734
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 73.733
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 vs 792.44
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 4.888
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 35.338
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 200.825
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 7218
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 7218
- 6.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 22 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1127 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 vs 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 162 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 389.2x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 185 Watt
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GM206 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 22 January 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 341 | 514 |
Price now | $169.99 | $229.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | 34.63 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 2,413 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 72 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,940 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | 400 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |