AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 1127 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 72 billion / sec
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 1142.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 6111
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 673
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 18734
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 73.733
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 792.44
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 4.888
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 35.338
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 200.825
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 7218
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 7218
- 6.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 162
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 22 January 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 1127 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1024 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 versus 162 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 389.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 185 Watt
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 162 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM206 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 22 January 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 514 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $229.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 34.63 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 2,413 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 72 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,940 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | 400 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |