Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1237
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 299
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4657
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 27.517
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 354.254
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.807
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 20.323
- 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 29.327
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3309
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3309
- 4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 487 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |