Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
• 5.2x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 1237
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 299
• 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 4657
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 27.517
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 vs 354.254
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 1.807
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 20.323
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 29.327
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 3309
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 3309
• 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 162 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 162

Compare specifications (specs)