NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 28.8 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 116 Watt
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1026 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 vs 322
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 15 March 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 vs 322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 1469
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 349
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 4271
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 11.994
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 291.627
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 1.023
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 vs 15.139
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 23.651
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1790
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1427
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2153
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1790
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1427
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2153
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 vs 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 vs 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 vs 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 vs 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 vs 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 2153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GF116 |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 15 March 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 1270 | 1019 |
Price now | $94.99 | $287.59 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | 7.49 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 116 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1026 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |