AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 4271
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 29 May 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 vs 4271 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 1229
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 1229
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 vs 1370
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 vs 1370
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2153 vs 2017
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2153 vs 2017
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 199
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 647
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 vs 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 vs 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 vs 2017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 vs 2017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 199 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 vs 647 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 | 4271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 | 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 | 2153 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 349 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 | 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Meso | GK107 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 29 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1268 | 1270 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
| Price now | $94.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R8 M365DX with others
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
