NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 26.78 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 642.8 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1483 vs 1093
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 344 vs 179
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4373 vs 3439
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 vs 10.489
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 vs 202.905
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 vs 0.66
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 vs 8.184
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 vs 19.323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 837 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 26.78 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 642.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1483 vs 1093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 344 vs 179 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4373 vs 3439 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 vs 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 vs 202.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 vs 0.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 vs 8.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 vs 19.323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1790
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2153
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1790
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2153
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1483 | 1093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 344 | 179 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4373 | 3439 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 202.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 0.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 8.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 19.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Place in performance rating | 1284 | 1287 |
Price now | $94.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 837 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 642.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 26.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |