AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 4271
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2165 vs 2153
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2165 vs 2153
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 29 May 2014 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 4271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 vs 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 vs 2153 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 1047
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 1047
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 vs 1019
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 vs 1019
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 195
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 817
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 vs 1019 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 195 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 vs 817 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | 4271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 2153 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 349 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Topaz | GK107 |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 29 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1269 | 1270 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
| Price now | $94.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260DX with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
