Reseña de la tarjeta de video AMD Radeon 520
La tarjeta de video Radeon 520 fue lanzada al mercado por AMD; fecha de lanzamiento: 18 April 2017. La tarjeta de video está diseñada para computadoras desktop, laptop y basado en la micro-arquitectura GCN 1.0 nombre clave Oland.
Velocidad de reloj del núcleo - 1030 MHz. Impulso de la velocidad del reloj - 1030 MHz. Tasa de llenado de texturas - 20.60 GTexel/s. Pipelines - 320. Desempeño de punto flotante - 660 GFLOPs. Tecnología de proceso de manufactura - 28 nm. Número de transistores - 1,040 million. Consumo de energía (TDP) - 50 Watt.
Tipo de memoria: GDDR5. Cantidad de RAM máxima - 4 GB. Ancho del bus de memoria - 64 bit. Velocidad de reloj de la memoria - 4500 MHz. Ancho de banda de la memoria - 48 GB/s. Memoria compartida - 0.
Referencias
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nombre | Valor |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 1182 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 1182.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1242 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1242.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3351 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3351.000 Fps |
Desempeño en juego
1. Destiny 2 (2017)
2. ELEX (2017)
3. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
4. FIFA 18 (2017)
5. F1 2017 (2017)
6. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
7. Dirt 4 (2017)
8. Rocket League (2017)
9. Prey (2017)
10. For Honor (2017)
11. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
12. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
2. ELEX (2017)
3. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
4. FIFA 18 (2017)
5. F1 2017 (2017)
6. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
7. Dirt 4 (2017)
8. Rocket League (2017)
9. Prey (2017)
10. For Honor (2017)
11. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
12. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
13. Overwatch (2016)
14. Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
15. Far Cry Primal (2016)
16. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
17. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
18. World of Warships (2015)
19. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
20. The Witcher 3 (2015)
21. Dirt Rally (2015)
22. BioShock Infinite (2013)
23. Tomb Raider (2013)
24. Diablo III (2012)
25. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
14. Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
15. Far Cry Primal (2016)
16. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
17. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
18. World of Warships (2015)
19. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
20. The Witcher 3 (2015)
21. Dirt Rally (2015)
22. BioShock Infinite (2013)
23. Tomb Raider (2013)
24. Diablo III (2012)
25. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Destiny 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 17.80 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.40 |
ELEX (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 17.30 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 8.10 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 6.60 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 22.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 7.00 |
FIFA 18 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 102.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 44.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 35.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 32.60 |
F1 2017 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 34.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 15.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 13.00 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 95.00 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 87.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 38.30 |
Dirt 4 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 46.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.60 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 9.60 |
Rocket League (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 57.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 22.20 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 14.00 |
Prey (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 30.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 11.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 9.20 |
For Honor (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 26.30 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.70 |
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 40.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 18.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.20 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 70.80 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 47.10 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.30 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 7.60 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 41.90 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 33.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 14.60 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
| Low, 1280x768 | 11.60 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 5.90 |
Far Cry Primal (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 21.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.00 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 28.80 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 17.15 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.60 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 7.40 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 52.00 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 31.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 13.80 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366x768 | 53.30 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 37.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.80 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 84.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 45.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 19.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.90 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 29.70 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 18.70 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 10.20 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 5.80 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 119.70 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 35.90 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 17.60 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.05 |
| High, 1366x768 | 29.85 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 9.60 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 62.30 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 31.80 |
| High, 1366x768 | 24.20 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 12.50 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024x768 | 65.90 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 41.50 |
| High, 1366x768 | 33.70 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 21.60 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280x720 | 44.80 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 29.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 19.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.60 |
Especificaciones
Esenciales |
|
| Arquitectura | GCN 1.0 |
| Nombre clave | Oland |
| Diseño | Radeon 500 Series |
| Generación GCN | 1st Gen |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 18 April 2017 |
| Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 1105 |
| Tipo | Desktop, Laptop |
Información técnica |
|
| Impulso de la velocidad de reloj | 1030 MHz |
| Unidades de Compute | 5 |
| Velocidad de reloj del núcleo | 1030 MHz |
| Desempeño de punto flotante | 660 GFLOPs |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s |
| Render output units | 4 |
| Stream Processors | 320 |
| Tasa de llenado de textura | 20.60 GTexel/s |
| Texture Units | 20 |
| Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 50 Watt |
| Número de transistores | 1,040 million |
Puertos y salidas de video |
|
| Conectores de pantalla | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soporte de DisplayPort | |
| Soporte de DVI Dual-link | |
| HDMI | |
| VGA | |
Compatibilidad, dimensiones y requerimientos |
|
| Interfaz | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Conectores de energía complementarios | None |
Soporte de API |
|
| DirectX | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | |
Memoria |
|
| Cantidad máxima de RAM | 4 GB |
| Ancho de banda de la memoria | 48 GB/s |
| Ancho de bus de la memoria | 64 bit |
| Velocidad de reloj de memoria | 4500 MHz |
| Tipo de memoria | GDDR5 |
| Memoria compartida | 0 |
Tecnologías |
|
| 4K H264 Decode | |
| 4K H264 Encode | |
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | |
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | |
| AppAcceleration | |
| DualGraphics | |
| Enduro | |
| H265/HEVC Decode | |
| H265/HEVC Encode | |
| HDMI 4K Support | |
| PowerTune | |
| TressFX | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | |
Navegación
Elige un GPU
Compara tarjetas de video
Compara la AMD Radeon 520 con otros
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ti
AMDRadeon 520 vs
ATIRadeon 9700 PRO
AMDRadeon 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7000 IGP
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon 530
