AMD A12-9700P versus AMD A9-9425
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A12-9700P et AMD A9-9425 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A12-9700P
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2428 versus 1513
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4344 versus 3077
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 versus 13.577
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 versus 40.717
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 versus 943
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1243
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4124 versus 3556
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 versus 943
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1243
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4124 versus 3556
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2428 versus 1513 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 versus 3077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 versus 13.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 versus 40.717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 versus 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4124 versus 3556 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 versus 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4124 versus 3556 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9425
- Environ 9% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.7 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1318 versus 1208
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 versus 1934
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 versus 2.183
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 versus 104.395
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 versus 0.129
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.7 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1318 versus 1208 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 versus 1934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 versus 2.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 versus 104.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 versus 0.129 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A12-9700P
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A12-9700P | AMD A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 | 1318 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2428 | 1513 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | 2034 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 | 3077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.183 | 7.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 | 112.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 | 0.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 | 13.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 | 40.717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4124 | 3556 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4124 | 3556 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A12-9700P | AMD A9-9425 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 2Q18 |
OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | AM9425AYN23AC |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1506 | 1560 |
Série | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Taille de dé | 250 mm | 124 mm |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 3 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 1200 million |
Ouvert | ||
Compute Cores | 5 | |
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 758 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |