AMD A12-9700P vs AMD A9-9425
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A12-9700P und AMD A9-9425 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A12-9700P
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2446 vs 1511
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4344 vs 3077
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 vs 13.577
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 vs 40.717
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 943
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1243
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4124 vs 3556
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 943
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1243
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4124 vs 3556
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2446 vs 1511 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 vs 3077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 vs 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 vs 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4124 vs 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4124 vs 3556 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A9-9425
- Etwa 9% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1317 vs 1211
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 vs 1934
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 2.183
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 vs 104.395
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 vs 0.129
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1317 vs 1211 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 vs 1934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 vs 104.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 vs 0.129 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A12-9700P
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A12-9700P | AMD A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1211 | 1317 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2446 | 1511 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | 2034 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 | 3077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.183 | 7.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 | 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 | 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 | 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 | 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4124 | 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4124 | 3556 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A12-9700P | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 | 2Q18 |
| OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | AM9425AYN23AC |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1435 | 1496 |
| Serie | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 250 mm | 124 mm |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 3 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 1200 million |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 1 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 758 MHz | 900 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A12-9700P mit anderen
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelCore i5-6198DU
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDA9-9425
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelXeon E3-1505L v5
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDEPYC 3201
AMDA12-9700P vs
IntelCore i7-9850HL
AMDA12-9700P vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
