AMD A9-9430 versus AMD A9-9425
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9430 et AMD A9-9425 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9430
- Environ 94495% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3500 MHz versus 3.7 GHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.793 versus 112.324
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.688 versus 0.615
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.424 versus 13.577
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1522 versus 1243
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4616 versus 3556
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1522 versus 1243
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4616 versus 3556
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz versus 3.7 GHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 versus 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 versus 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 versus 13.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 versus 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 versus 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 versus 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 versus 3556 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9425
- Environ 60% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 versus 7.568
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 versus 38.08
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 943 versus 830
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 943 versus 830
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) versus 160 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 versus 7.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 versus 38.08 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 versus 830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 versus 830 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9430
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A9-9430 | AMD A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 | 7.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 | 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 | 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 | 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 | 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 830 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 | 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 830 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 | 3556 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1331 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1527 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A9-9430 | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A9-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1382 | 1566 |
| Processor Number | A9-9430 | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Laptop |
| Date de sortie | 2Q18 | |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Série | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3200 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 160 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Taille de dé | 124 mm | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 1 |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R5 series | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FT4) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A9-9430 avec des autres
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA10-7870K
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-7820X
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-9700K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA6-6420K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA8 PRO-7600B
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i3-4350T
