AMD A9-9430 vs AMD A9-9425
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A9-9430 und AMD A9-9425 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A9-9430
- Etwa 94495% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3500 MHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.793 vs 112.324
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.688 vs 0.615
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.424 vs 13.577
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1522 vs 1243
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4616 vs 3556
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1522 vs 1243
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4616 vs 3556
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3500 MHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 vs 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 vs 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 vs 13.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 vs 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 vs 3556 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A9-9425
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L1 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L1 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 7.568
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 38.08
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 943 vs 830
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 943 vs 830
| Spezifikationen | |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 160 KB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 7.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 38.08 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 943 vs 830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 943 vs 830 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A9-9430
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9430 | AMD A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 | 7.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 | 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 | 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 | 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 | 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 830 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 | 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 830 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 | 3556 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1331 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1527 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A9-9430 | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Stoney Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A9-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1382 | 1566 |
| Processor Number | A9-9430 | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Startdatum | 2Q18 | |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Serie | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3200 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3500 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Matrizengröße | 124 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1200 million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon R5 series | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | BGA (FT4) | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A9-9430 mit anderen
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA10-7870K
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-7820X
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-9700K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA6-6420K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA8 PRO-7600B
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i3-4350T
