AMD PRO A10-9700E versus Intel Core i3-3220
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-9700E et Intel Core i3-3220 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-9700E
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.5 GHz versus 3.3 GHz
- Environ 38% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 65.3°C
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3027 versus 2275
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1490 versus 1340
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 versus 2.048
- 33.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 versus 7.493
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 versus 0.277
- 23.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 versus 1.059
- 30x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 versus 2.499
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4350 versus 1527
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4350 versus 1527
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 versus 8 April 2012 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz versus 3.3 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 65.3°C |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3027 versus 2275 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1490 versus 1340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 versus 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 versus 7.493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 versus 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 versus 1.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 versus 2.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 versus 1527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 versus 1527 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-3220
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1726 versus 1438
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 607 versus 493
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1726 versus 1438 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 607 versus 493 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-9700E
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-3220
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1438 | 1726 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3027 | 2275 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 607 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1490 | 1340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 | 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 | 7.493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 | 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 | 1.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 | 2.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 | 1527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 | 1527 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | Intel Core i3-3220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | 8 April 2012 |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1246 | 2716 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $117 | |
| Prix maintenant | $34.90 | |
| Processor Number | i3-3220 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 35.75 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 65.3°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Taille de dé | 94 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1333/1600 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A10-9700E avec des autres
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDA10-6790K
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i5-6600
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i3-7300T
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1756B
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i5-5675C
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500X
