Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2340 versus 1296
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 versus 762
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 versus 9.709
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 versus 0.13
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.258 versus 0.213
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 versus 2.308
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2340 versus 1296 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 411 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 versus 762 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 versus 9.709 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 versus 0.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 versus 0.213 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 versus 2.308 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 95 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1307 versus 1216
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.25 versus 0.612
| Caractéristiques | |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 95 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1307 versus 1216 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.25 versus 0.612 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 1307 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2340 | 1296 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 411 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 762 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 2.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 9.709 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 0.213 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 2.308 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Callisto |
| Date de sortie | Q1'08 | January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3017 | 3025 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Taille de dé | 214 mm2 | 258 mm |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 820 million | 758 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | |
| Ouvert | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6300
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 555 BE
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
