Revue de la carte vidéo AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

Radeon R2 Graphics carte vidéo sortie par AMD; release date: 27 February 2015. La carte video est conçue pour les ordinateurs desktop et est basé sur la microarchitecture GCN 2.0 nom de code Beema.

Vitesse du noyau - 700 MHz. Taux de remplissage de la texture - 5.6 GTexel / s. Pipelines - 128. Performance de point flottant - 179.2 gflops. Technologie de fabrication - 28 nm . Compte de transistors - 930 million. Utilisation d’énergie (TDP) - 15 Watt.

Type de mémoire: System Shared.

Référence

PassMark
G3D Mark
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
38588
248
PassMark
G2D Mark
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
1295
68
Geekbench
OpenCL
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
345150
7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Face Detection
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
939.363 mPixels/s
2.751 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Ocean Surface Simulation
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
14101.507 Frames/s
93.854 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
T-Rex
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
95.851 Frames/s
0.263 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Video Composition
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
530.303 Frames/s
6.299 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop
Bitcoin Mining
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
4429.590 mHash/s
16.121 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0
Car Chase Offscreen
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
34770 Frames
375 Frames
GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
27823 Frames
1282 Frames
GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
69225 Frames
1912 Frames
GFXBench 4.0
Car Chase Offscreen
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
34770.000 Fps
375.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0
Manhattan
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
27823.000 Fps
1282.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex
Top 1 GPU
This GPU
69225.000 Fps
1912.000 Fps
Nom Valeur
PassMark - G3D Mark 248
PassMark - G2D Mark 68
Geekbench - OpenCL 7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection 2.751 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation 93.854 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex 0.263 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition 6.299 Frames/s
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining 16.121 mHash/s
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen 375 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan 1282 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex 1912 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen 375.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan 1282.000 Fps
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex 1912.000 Fps

Performance des jeux

1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
3. Rocket League (2017)
4. Prey (2017)
5. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
6. Civilization VI (2016)
7. Overwatch (2016)
8. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
9. World of Warships (2015)
10. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
11. Dirt Rally (2015)
12. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
13. Alien: Isolation (2014)
14. Sims 4 (2014)
15. BioShock Infinite (2013)
16. Tomb Raider (2013)
17. Diablo III (2012)
18. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
19. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
20. StarCraft 2 (2010)
21. World of Warcraft (2005)

Counter-Strike: GO (2012)

Low, 1024x76826.90
Medium, 1366x76821.70
High, 1366x76820.00

Team Fortress 2 (2017)

Low, 1280x72019.70
Medium, 1366x76818.50

Rocket League (2017)

Low, 1280x72030.80

Prey (2017)

Low, 1280x7209.40

Farming Simulator 17 (2016)

Low, 1280x72043.50
Medium, 1366x76826.40

Civilization VI (2016)

Low, 1024x76821.60
Medium, 1366x7688.50

Overwatch (2016)

Low, 1280x72017.50
Medium, 1366x76815.00

Rainbow Six Siege (2015)

Low, 1024x76820.40
Medium, 1366x76813.80

World of Warships (2015)

Low, 1366x76825.50
Medium, 1366x76820.30

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

Low, 1280x72028.70
Medium, 1366x76818.40

Dirt Rally (2015)

Low, 1024x76825.10
Medium, 1366x76813.00

Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)

Low, 1024x76811.20
Medium, 1366x7688.70

Alien: Isolation (2014)

Low, 1024x76817.80
Medium, 1366x76810.30

Sims 4 (2014)

Low, 1024x76882.10
Medium, 1366x76820.70

BioShock Infinite (2013)

Low, 1280x72034.45
Medium, 1366x76817.25
High, 1366x76814.00

Tomb Raider (2013)

Low, 1024x76835.70
Medium, 1366x76815.70
High, 1366x76811.10

Diablo III (2012)

Low, 1024x76828.50
Medium, 1366x76817.80
High, 1366x76815.90

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)

Low, 1280x72024.70
Medium, 1366x76816.30
High, 1366x76810.80

Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)

Low, 1024x76841.00
High, 1366x76820.30

StarCraft 2 (2010)

Low, 1024x76859.60
Medium, 1360x76817.80
High, 1360x76814.10

World of Warcraft (2005)

Low, 800x60065.20
Medium, 1024x76833.20

Processeurs avec AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

CPU Genre Nom de code Date de sortie Nombre de noyaux Fréquence maximale
AMD E2-6110 Laptop Beema 29 April 2014 4
AMD E1-6010 Laptop Beema 29 April 2014 2
AMD E1 Micro-6200T Laptop Mullins 29 April 2014 2
AMD E2-7110 Laptop Carrizo-L 7 May 2015 4 1.8 GHz
AMD E1-7010 Laptop Carrizo-L 7 May 2015 2 1.5 GHz
AMD E2-9000e Mobile Stoney Ridge 2 2000 MHz
AMD E1-6015 Mobile Beema Q2'15 2

Caractéristiques

Essentiel
Architecture GCN 2.0
Nom de code Beema
Date de sortie 27 February 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1593
Genre Desktop

Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau 700 MHz
Performance á point flottant 179.2 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm
Pipelines 128
Taux de remplissage de la texture 5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Compte de transistor 930 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran No outputs

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface IGP

Soutien API
DirectX 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5

Mémoire
Genre de mémoire System Shared

Navigation

Référence
Performance des jeux
Processeurs avec cet GPU
Caractéristiques

Choisir un GPU

Comparer les cartes vidéo

Comparer AMD Radeon R2 Graphics avec des autres

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 NVIDIA
Quadro FX 570 AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GT AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 ATI
Radeon HD 4650 AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8180 AMD
Radeon HD 8180 AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GRID K340 NVIDIA
GRID K340 AMD Radeon R2 Graphics AMD
Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 NVIDIA
GeForce GT 720

À propos de nous

AskGeek.io - Comparer les processeurs et les cartes vidéo pour choisir le meilleur.

Sections

Links

Langage

English English
Deutsch Deutsch
Française Française
Español Español
Português Português
Русский Русский
© 2024, AskGeek.io