AMD Radeon R2 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 versus 2292
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 versus 280
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 versus 519
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 versus 280
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 versus 519
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 versus 29 September 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 versus 2292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 versus 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 versus 519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 versus 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 versus 519 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.75 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 192 versus 128
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 306.0 gflops versus 179.2 gflops
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 versus 248
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 versus 68
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.418 versus 2.751
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 versus 93.854
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.395 versus 0.263
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.158 versus 6.299
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 versus 16.121
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 895 versus 375
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 895 versus 375
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 128 |
| Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops versus 179.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 versus 248 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 versus 68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 versus 2.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 versus 93.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 versus 0.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 versus 6.299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 versus 16.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 versus 375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 versus 375 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | 614 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 200 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | 2292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | 4.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | 142.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | 0.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | 8.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | 17.317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | 895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | 895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | 280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 519 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Beema | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 | 29 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1592 | 1593 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | |
| Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 179.2 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 930 million | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R2 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGRID K340
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
