AMD FirePro M5100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 482
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.642 versus 32.378
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 9 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 versus 32.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1544 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.4 billion / sec versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 59% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,581.1 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4612 versus 2103
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15124 versus 6773
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 versus 22.202
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 versus 537.558
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 versus 2.245
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.363 versus 108.052
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 versus 2926
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 versus 2926
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1544 MHz versus 725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.4 billion / sec versus 31 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581.1 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4612 versus 2103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15124 versus 6773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 versus 22.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 versus 537.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 versus 2.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 versus 108.052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 versus 2926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 versus 2926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 4612 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 482 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 | 15124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Venus | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 9 November 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 648 | 651 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $289.88 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |