AMD FirePro M5100 versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M5100 and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 522
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3485
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3485
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3485 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 61.6 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,971 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3189 versus 2103
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 versus 22.202
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 804.436 versus 537.558
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 versus 2.245
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 versus 40.642
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 versus 108.052
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 versus 2926
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 versus 2926
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 61.6 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,971 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3189 versus 2103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 versus 22.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 versus 537.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 versus 2.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 versus 40.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 versus 108.052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 versus 2926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 versus 2926 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 3189 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 43.745 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | 804.436 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | 3.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | 64.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | 221.539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Venus | Bonaire |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 647 | 648 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
Prix maintenant | $239 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |