AMD FirePro M5100 versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M5100 and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 523
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3485
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3485
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3485 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 61.6 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Environ 99% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,971 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3190 versus 2103
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 versus 22.202
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 804.436 versus 537.558
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 versus 2.245
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 versus 40.642
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 versus 108.052
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 versus 2926
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 versus 2926
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 61.6 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,971 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3190 versus 2103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 versus 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 versus 537.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 versus 2.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 versus 40.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 versus 108.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 versus 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 versus 2926 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro M5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 3190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 523 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro M5100 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Venus | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 647 | 648 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Prix maintenant | $239 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro M5100 avec des autres
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
AMDFirePro S7150
