AMD FirePro W4190M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W4190M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4190M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 900 MHz versus 863 MHz
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 versus 7107
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.417 versus 0.731
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 versus 3333
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 November 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 versus 7107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 versus 0.731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 825 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 55.23 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 92% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,326 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1993 versus 1148
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 180
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 284.018
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 1704
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 versus 2529
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 1704
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 versus 2529
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1993 versus 1148 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 180 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 284.018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 versus 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 versus 2529 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W4190M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1148 | 1993 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 | 7107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 | 0.731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1704 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1704 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W4190M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Opal | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 12 November 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1066 | 1045 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.6 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W4190M avec des autres
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
