AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 863 MHz
• 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 7107
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.417 vs 0.731
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3333
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 825 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1993 vs 1148
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 180
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 284.018
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1704
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2529
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1704
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2529

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1148 1993
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23384 7107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	284.018 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.417 0.731
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2529 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3889 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2529 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3889 3333

Compare specifications (specs)