AMD Radeon 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 88% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,505 gflops versus 800 GFLOPs
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 versus 1030
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 versus 174
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 versus 5014
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 2021
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2246
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 2021
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2246
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 versus 506
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops versus 800 GFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3366 versus 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 versus 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10985 versus 5014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 versus 506 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 | 3366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 245 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 | 10985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 5264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 5264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 1231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Meso | GM107 |
| Conception | Radeon 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 3rd Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1099 | 735 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 800 GFLOPs | 1,505 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3/GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 530 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
