AMD Radeon E6760 versus AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E6760 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E6760
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 108 Watt
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 versus 313
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 versus 3799
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 versus 3358
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 May 2011 versus 21 January 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 versus 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 versus 3799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 480
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 576.0 gflops
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1251 versus 877
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.69 versus 3.112
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 293.065
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.004 versus 0.445
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 versus 13.002
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 52.148
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 820
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2279 versus 1945
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 820
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2279 versus 1945
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 576.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1251 versus 877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 versus 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 versus 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 52.148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 versus 1945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6760
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon E6760 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 | 1251 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 | 3799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.112 | 9.69 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 293.065 | 615.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | 1.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.002 | 26.748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.148 | 115.157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 820 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 820 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon E6760 | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Turks | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 2 May 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $239.99 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1129 | 1130 |
Prix maintenant | $239.99 | $76.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.07 | 27.17 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 800 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.4 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 198 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.0 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 51.2 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |