NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus AMD Radeon E6760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon E6760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 657 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 480
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 576.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 versus 877
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 versus 3.112
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 293.065
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 versus 0.445
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 13.002
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 versus 52.148
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 820
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 versus 1945
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 820
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 versus 1945
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 2 May 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops versus 576.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 versus 877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 versus 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 versus 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 versus 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 versus 52.148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 versus 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 versus 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 versus 1945 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E6760
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 versus 232
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9761 versus 5599
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 versus 3333
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 versus 3333
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 versus 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 versus 5599 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon E6760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | 877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 485 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5599 | 9761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 52.148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3528 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon E6760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 2 May 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1126 | 1129 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $239.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz | 600 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |