AMD Radeon E8870 versus AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E8870 and AMD Radeon R9 290 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E8870
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 947 MHz
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 versus 3711
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 versus 3354
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 versus 3711
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 versus 3354
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 versus 5 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 947 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 151.5 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 768
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,849 gflops versus 1,536 gflops
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8256 versus 3368
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 versus 708
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.325 versus 36.948
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1366.314 versus 874.689
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 versus 1.11
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6300 versus 4620
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6300 versus 4620
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 151.5 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,849 gflops versus 1,536 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8256 versus 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 versus 708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 versus 36.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 versus 874.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 versus 1.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 versus 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 versus 4620 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon E8870 | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 8256 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | 89.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | 1366.314 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | 10.034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3694 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon E8870 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Saturn | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 | 5 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 352 | 354 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 4,849 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon E8870 avec des autres
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon E8870 vs
IntelArc A370M
