NVIDIA Quadro 2000D versus AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and AMD Radeon HD 6770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 74% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 62 Watt versus 108 Watt
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 318
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3930 versus 3802
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.122 versus 9.69
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 versus 2279
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 versus 2279
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 October 2011 versus 21 January 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt versus 108 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 318 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3930 versus 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 versus 9.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 versus 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 versus 2279 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Environ 70% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 20 GTexel / s
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 192
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 versus 976
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 320.57
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 versus 12.67
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 31.168
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 1453
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 1453
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 20 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1262 versus 976 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 320.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 versus 12.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 31.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | 1262 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 318 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3930 | 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | 9.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | 615.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 1.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | 26.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | 115.157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | 2546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF106 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 5 October 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $129 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1115 | 1117 |
| Prix maintenant | $209 | $76.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.27 | 27.17 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 625 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 178 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 41.6 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
