AMD Radeon HD 6770M versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6770M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 725 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 versus 223
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 versus 1679
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3077
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 versus 1679
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3077
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 January 2011 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 versus 223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 versus 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 versus 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3077 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 480
- Environ 61% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,120.0 gflops versus 696.0 gflops
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1092 versus 964
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.17 versus 4.817
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.971 versus 234.842
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.86 versus 0.393
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.108 versus 15.475
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.606 versus 33.71
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,120.0 gflops versus 696.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 versus 964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.17 versus 4.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 versus 234.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 versus 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 versus 15.475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 versus 33.71 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 964 | 1092 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 223 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 | 8.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | 585.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | 0.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | 20.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | 98.606 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2070 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 6770M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Whistler | Broadway |
| Date de sortie | 4 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 988 | 1190 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 696.0 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.4 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.6 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 6770M avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 980 XGL
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
AMDRadeon HD 6770M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile
