AMD Radeon HD 6790 versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6790 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 840 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 1% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 151 Watt
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4200 MHz versus 4000 MHz
| Date de sortie | 4 April 2011 versus 30 September 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.2 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 80% de pipelines plus haut: 1440 versus 800
- Environ 55% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,344.0 gflops
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1966 versus 1552
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 versus 367
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.467 versus 12.318
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 750.421
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.541 versus 1.234
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 28.768
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 versus 3127
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3534
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 versus 3127
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3534
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.2 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 versus 800 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,344.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1966 versus 1552 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 versus 367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 versus 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 750.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 versus 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 28.768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6790
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1552 | 1966 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.318 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.421 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.234 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3127 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3127 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 6790 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Barts | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 4 April 2011 | 30 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 856 | 751 |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.40 | |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,344.0 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.6 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,700 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 725 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 198 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.4 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 6790 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
ATIFirePro V5800
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon HD 6790 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
