NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 versus AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 45.4 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2762 versus 1590
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 versus 367
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 12.318
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.234
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 versus 28.768
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 versus 3127
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 versus 3534
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 versus 3127
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 versus 3534
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2011 versus 4 April 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2762 versus 1590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 versus 367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 versus 28.768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 versus 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 versus 3534 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 840 MHz versus 810 MHz
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 336
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,344.0 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4200 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 versus 623.187
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 versus 62.233
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3332
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,344.0 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.421 versus 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 versus 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3332 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2762 | 1590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 | 367 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8668 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 | 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | 750.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 | 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2011 | 4 April 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 879 | 880 |
| Prix maintenant | $353.59 | $64.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | 39.40 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops | 1,344.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
| Pipelines | 336 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | 198 mm |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
